Correction: Meal Shaming story
BOSTON (AP) — In a story May 16 about a proposal to prevent school districts in Massachusetts from denying hot lunches to students who don’t have the money to pay for them, The Associated Press reported erroneously that the author of a recent study on the topic was Wendy Baker. Her name is Patricia Baker.
A corrected version of the story is below:
Proposal seeks to end ‘meal shaming’ in public schools
Massachusetts lawmakers are being urged to approve legislation that would prevent school districts from denying hot lunches to students who don’t have the money to pay for them
By BOB SALSBERG
BOSTON (AP) — Working in an elementary school cafeteria, Wendy Timmons said all she wanted to do was serve children a hot lunch and put smiles on their faces.
But if a student’s family fell behind in paying their school meal account, the smile could quickly turn to tears.
“I had to ask them if they have any money,” Timmons recalled. “If they didn’t have any money, I had to take the meal away, and hold up my hands in the shape of a C,” a signal that instructed the server to prepare an “alternative” lunch for the child — generally a cold cheese sandwich.
The uneaten hot lunch, for sanitary reasons, would then be thrown out.
Critics often refer to such policies as “meal shaming” or “lunch shaming,” because of the humiliation it can cause children who are singled out in the lunch line through no fault of their own.
Timmons was among those urging the Massachusetts Legislature’s education committee on Tuesday to approve a measure aimed at preventing children from being caught in the middle of disputes between school districts and families with unpaid meal debt. The committee voted to study it further.
“No school should punish a child for not having lunch money,” said Democratic Sen. Cynthia Creem, of Newton, a sponsor of the bill that seeks, among other things, to prohibit school employees from forcing a child to accept an alternative meal or taking other actions, such as barring students from extracurricular activities or even graduation ceremonies.
The prevalence of “meal shaming” is difficult to measure, in part because policies vary widely between school districts, and can differ based on age and grade level. Some large urban school districts, including Boston, provide free meals for all students, and in other communities many children are eligible for free or reduced price meals if their families are income eligible.
A recent study by the Massachusetts Law Reform Institute found that in more than two dozen school districts, secondary school students without money often don’t eat at all. In one high school, students were told their best option was simply to try and borrow money from a friend.
Most districts, however, offer the cheese sandwich or other less appetizing selections to students who have exceed their “meal account cap,” imposed by the school.
“You can’t use kids for debt collection activities,” said Patricia Baker, an author of the study. “You can’t use them as pawns, and you can’t shame them.”
A number of U.S. states, including California, New York, New Mexico, Oregon and West Virginia, have recently passed laws to prohibit such practices, according to the Food Research & Action Council, a national advocacy group.
Pennsylvania revised its school code to require that all children receive the same lunch after an elementary school cafeteria worker, Stacy Koltiska, quit in protest in 2016 after being forced to take a hot meal away from a boy whose parents were more than $25 behind in his meal account. The school superintendent called the incident a mistake, but noted the district was owed tens of thousands of dollars in meal debt by hundreds of parents.
School officials contend there is no deliberate attempt to punish or embarrass children over lunch debt, but that it can be an expensive proposition for districts already facing severe budget constraints.
“It puts the school in a difficult position,” said Paul Andrews, director of professional development and government services for the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents, in an interview.
Some parents, Andrews said, do not want to acknowledge their financial difficulties and apply for free lunches for their children. In other cases, officials and advocates say, financially struggling parents may simply be unaware they are eligible for the assistance.
The legislation in Massachusetts needs more study, the committee decided after Tuesday’s hearing, making it unlikely to pass before the July 31 close of the legislative session.
Timmons’ 17-year-old daughter, Susan, said she still remembered being meal shamed herself as a young child and having little concept of money. She recounted an incident when her elementary school-aged sister had her favorite hot turkey lunch snatched away from her by a cafeteria worker.
“She cried and cried and cried until my mother came and picked her up from school,” Susan Timmons said.