EU bans cosmetics with animal-tested ingredients
BRUSSELS (AP) — The European Union banned the sale of new cosmetic products containing ingredients tested on animals with immediate effect Monday.
“This is a great opportunity for Europe to set an example of responsible innovation in cosmetics without any compromise on consumer safety,” said Tonio Borg, the EU’s top official on health and consumer issues.
Animal rights groups were quick to cheer the measure, but Cosmetics Europe, a trade body representing the EU’s €71 billion ($93 billion) industry, said the ban “acts as a brake on innovation.”
While the industry’s rabbits, mice or guinea pigs used in testing will now be spared, consumers are unlikely to notice immediate changes because products containing ingredients that were tested on animals before the ban can remain on the shelves.
The 27-country bloc’s executive arm, the European Commission, claimed the decision “is in line with what many European citizens believe firmly: that the development of cosmetics does not warrant animal testing.”
The EU has banned animal testing of finished cosmetic products since 2004. The ban on cosmetics containing animal-tested ingredients was first decided four years ago but initially left loopholes for certain tests following resistance from cosmetics companies.
At the moment, neither the U.S. nor Asian markets have similar bans in place. While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration prohibits the sale of unsafe cosmetics, it doesn’t require that animal tests be conducted to show that the cosmetics are safe.
Animal rights groups such as Humane Society International cheered the EU’s decision on the full ban as a major step in stopping animals’ suffering, saying the bloc has now become “the world’s largest cruelty-free cosmetics market.”
The group also said it hopes the course taken by the EU - whose nations combined form the world’s biggest economy - will soon be replicated by the global cosmetics industry.
The phase-out of animal testing over the years in Europe has resulted in a dramatic drop in such activity among U.S. cosmetic and personal care product manufacturers looking to sell overseas. U.S. beauty makers generated about $38.3 billion in revenue in 2011, according to the latest statistics from the Washington-based industry trade group Personal Care Products Council.
“This had an impact on the U.S. cosmetic industry,” said Kathy Guillermo, senior vice-president of laboratory investigation for the activist group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, known as PETA. “It also ushered in a whole new era of non-animal science” in Europe.
The cosmetic industry’s European trade body, however, said the new EU ban threatens the industry’s competitiveness and comes too early because there is still no alternative for some specific animal tests to ensure the safety of all ingredients.
Cosmetics Europe chief Bertil Heerink said “by implementing the ban at this time, the European Union is jeopardizing the industry’s ability to innovate,” putting the 27-country bloc at odds with its own goal of fostering a knowledge and science-driven economy.
The sector’s European cosmetic companies had 2010 revenues of €71 billion, directly employing some 180,000 people, according to the EU Commission.
The Commission stressed it will engage with its trading partners - for example, the United States and China - “to explain and promote the European model and to work towards the international acceptance” of the ban.
“The Commission will make this an integral part of the Union’s trade agenda and international cooperation,” it said.
The EU and the U.S. are currently launching negotiations aimed at reaching a free-trade agreement.
New cosmetic products manufactured outside the EU containing ingredients that were tested on animals could still be sold in Europe, but only if producers are able to document their safety to EU regulators without using data gathered through animal tests, said EU health official Sabine Lecrenier.
Cosmetic products that contain pharmaceutical ingredients that have been tested on animals because of the EU’s rules governing pharmaceutical products can also still be marketed in Europe.
Anne D’Innocenzio in New York contributed to this story.
Juergen Baetz can be reached on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/jbaetz