US high court ponders death row inmate with low IQ
WASHINGTON (AP) — A person from Florida with an IQ as high as 75 may be diagnosed as mentally disabled and be eligible for help getting a job. But on death row, Florida says having an IQ higher than 70 means an inmate is not mentally disabled and may be executed.
The Supreme Court barred states from executing mentally disabled inmates in 2002, but until now has left the determination of who is mentally disabled to the states.
In arguments Monday, 68-year-old Florida inmate Freddie Lee Hall is challenging the state’s use of a rigid IQ cutoff to determine mental disability.
Florida is among a few states that use a score of 70, as measured by IQ tests, as the threshold for concluding an inmate is not mentally disabled, even when other evidence indicates he is.
“Simply put, IQ tests are not a perfect measure of a person’s intellectual ability,” Hall’s lawyers told the court in written arguments.
In nine tests between 1968 and 2008, Hall scored as low as 60 and as high as 80, with his most recent scores between 69 and 74, according to the state.
A judge in an earlier phase of the case concluded Hall “had been mentally retarded his entire life.” Psychiatrists and other medical professionals who examined him said he is mentally disabled.
Hall was sentenced to death for murdering Karol Hurst, a 21-year-old pregnant woman abducted leaving a Florida grocery store in 1978.
Hall also has been convicted of killing a sheriff’s deputy and has been imprisoned for the past 35 years. He earlier served a prison term for assault with intent to commit rape and was out on parole when he killed Hurst.
Hall’s guilt is not at issue before the high court.
Florida’s regulatory code says individuals with IQs as high as 75 may be diagnosed as mildly intellectually disabled, potentially allowing them to receive state aid. The code relies on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the authoritative manual of the American Psychiatric Association, setting an IQ of 70, plus or minus 5, as the upper range of intellectual disability.
The range reflects something that is true of all standardized testing — results are generally reliable, but not 100 percent so, and they are reported along with a margin of error.
Psychiatrists and psychologists supporting Hall also say that an IQ test alone is insufficient for a diagnosis of mental disability — an accurate diagnosis also must include evaluating an individual’s ability to function in society, along with finding that the mental disability began in childhood.
But the Florida Supreme Court has ruled that the state law regarding executions and mental disability has no wiggle room if an inmate tests above 70.
In defending Hall’s death sentence, the state says it makes sense to set a different threshold for vocational services than for criminal justice.
But Florida Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi said in court papers that for death row inmates “the risk of overdiagnosis of mental retardation is particularly pronounced.”
″(They) have every incentive to secure such a diagnosis,” she said.
Florida also says there’s no national consensus about a strict IQ limit and no reason for the court to impose one.
The outcome of Hall’s case is unlikely to affect the busiest death penalty state, Texas, which does not impose a rigid IQ test to assess mental disability.
The case is Hall v. Florida, 12-10882.
Follow Mark Sherman on Twitter: https://twitter.com/shermancourt