US jury gets case, will decide punishment for Jodi Arias
PHOENIX (AP) — The case of convicted murderer Jodi Arias went to a jury Wednesday that will decide if she is sentenced to death or life in prison for killing her boyfriend, killing that grabbed global attention over the violent nature of the crime.
The jury got the case after a defense lawyer made his final plea for mercy for Arias, whose 2013 trial was broadcast live and became a sensation. It revealed that Arias had shot and slit the throat of her on-again-off-again boyfriend Travis Alexander.
Arias, now 34, was convicted then of killing Alexander. That jury, however, deadlocked on her punishment, prompting a penalty retrial before a new jury of four men and eight women.
Arias has acknowledged killing Alexander but said it was self-defense after he attacked her.
Lawyer Kirk Nurmi said Wednesday that Arias was the victim of a twisted relationship in which she was sexually humiliated by Alexander, who was killed after he and Arias had sex and took intimate photos.
“Why did we go from this sexual encounter to the killing?” Nurmi said. “Because of this tumultuous relationship. Because the emotional stress all this was bringing on.”
The defense attorney said Alexander used Arias to quench his sexual urges, called her demeaning names and told her she was soulless.
Arias looked at her attorney as he pleaded for her life. When a prosecutor made his closing arguments on Tuesday, she occasionally cast her eyes on the jury but mostly looked elsewhere.
If another jury deadlock occurs, the death penalty would automatically be removed as an option, leaving a judge to sentence Arias to life in prison or life in prison with the possibility of release after 25 years.
Closing arguments Tuesday featured dueling images from the defense and prosecution that portrayed the case in much different lights.
The defense showed happy photos of Arias from her childhood and time with Alexander. The prosecutor showed gruesome crime-scene photos of the victim’s slit throat.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez called Arias dishonest, questioned her claim that she’s remorseful for having killed Alexander, and tried to minimize the role her psychological problems played in the case.
Prosecutors said Arias attacked Alexander in a jealous rage after he wanted to end their relationship and planned a trip to Mexico with another woman.
Nurmi portrayed Alexander as a man divided between his Mormon faith and sexual desires that led him to have relationships with several women.
Martinez said Arias falsely attacked Alexander’s character to draw attention from her own actions.
Arias passed up a chance to address the jury, saying she wanted to make such comments but insisting the courtroom be cleared. The judge said an appeals court has forbidden Arias from making such comments behind closed doors.