Related topics

Correction: Teen Detained-No Fly List story

August 7, 2014

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (AP) — ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (AP) — In a story July 18 about the U.S. government’s no-fly list, The Associated Press reported erroneously that the government added more than 1.5 million names to the list in the last five years. The National Counterterrorism Center says the list has grown from about 550,000 people in March 2010 to 1.1 million people at the end of 2013. There have been 1.5 million nominations to the list, which can include both new names and updates or changes to existing names.

A corrected version of the story is below:

Terrorist database continues to grow at rapid rate

Virginia challenge to No Fly List exposes rapidly expanding terror database inclusions


Associated Press

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (AP) — The government is rapidly expanding the number of names it accepts for inclusion on its terrorist watch list, with the number of people on the list doubling from March 2010 to the end of 2013, according to government figures.

Furthermore, the number of nominations to the list — which includes both new names and updates to existing names — also has snowballed in recent years, according to numbers divulged by the federal government as part of a lawsuit.

Those included in the Terrorist Screening Database could find themselves on the government’s no-fly list or face additional scrutiny at airports, though only a small percentage of people in the database are actually on the list.

It has been known for years that the government became more aggressive in nominating people for the watch list following al-Qaida operative Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s failed effort to blow up an airplane over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009.

But the numbers disclosed by the government show nominations have snowballed. In fiscal 2009, which ended Sept. 30, 2009, 227,932 names were nominated to the database. In fiscal 2010, which includes the months after the attempted Christmas bombing, nominations rose to 250,847. In fiscal 2012, they increased to 336,712, and in fiscal 2013 — the most recent year provided — nominations jumped to 468,749.

The government disclosed the figures in July in a civil lawsuit out of Virginia challenging the constitutionality of the no-fly list.

At a hearing July 18, government lawyers urged a judge to dismiss the case, claiming state secrets will be exposed if the case proceeds.

U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga issued no immediate ruling but expressed deep skepticism of the government’s motion.

Gadeir Abbas, a lawyer for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which filed the suit on behalf of a northern Virginia man, said the numbers show the government is failing to abide by the standards required for inclusion, which require “a reasonable suspicion to believe that a person is a known or a suspected terrorist.”

“There aren’t 1 million people who are known or suspected terrorists,” Abbas said after the hearing. “This suggests the standard the government is applying is wildly loose.”

A Terrorist Screening Center official declined comment Friday on the numbers. Weeks later, a government official explained that a “nomination” meant new names, as well as changes or updates to existing names on the list, and the figure in the court document should not be interpreted to mean that 1.5 million people have been added to the watch list in the last five years.

A counterterrorism official previously told The Associated Press that as of August 2013, there were 700,000 names on the watch list. The official spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss sensitive security information. The National Counterterrorism Center, which maintains the information, said Aug. 5 that there were 1.1 million people in the database at the end of 2013.

Counterterrorism officials have said names are routinely removed from the list.

In the July hearing, though, Abbas argued that the process the government uses to evaluate who should be on the list is opaque, and that people who find themselves on it never receive an explanation or a meaningful way to get removed.

Abbas’ client, Gulet Mohamed, 21, of Alexandria, has never been told why he is on the list. Mohamed, a naturalized citizen, was stranded in Kuwait in 2011 trying to return to the U.S. after a trip to Yemen and his native Somalia. U.S. authorities allowed Mohamed to fly home after he sued, but the lawsuit challenging the legality of the list remains unresolved. He has never been charged with any sort of terror-related offense, and says his inclusion on the list is a mistake.

Government lawyer Amy Powell told the judge that the government does not seek to invoke its state secrets privilege lightly, but said it would inevitably have to expose its methods and sources if it explained at a public trial why Mohamed was put on the list.

Trenga, though, said a secret filing he received from the government partially explaining its rationale for invoking state secrets was inadequate.

“I didn’t notice any real restraint” in how the government was invoking the privilege, Trenga said. “They were the kinds of things that would not jump out at you as state secrets.”

Earlier this year, Trenga rejected a previous government effort to get the case dismissed.

The Alexandria case follows a ruling last month by a federal judge in Oregon that found people placed on the list have no adequate means to challenge their status. She ordered the government to develop a better means for seeking redress from placement on the list. The government has not yet decided whether to appeal that ruling.


Associated Press writer Eileen Sullivan in Washington contributed to this report.

Update hourly